🔗 Share this article

I have some opinions regarding the remarks made by ESPN broadcaster Chris Fowler following the Serbian champion's victory over Taylor Fritz in the US Open last eight. Look – the athlete represents the United States, Fowler is from the US – and sports frequently encourage patriotic sentiment. Some disappointment would have been understandable. Rather, Fowler brought up the ongoing absence of American men at grand slam tournaments: not one of them has won a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the tournament.

Everyone love a narrative, me too. But really. Suppose Fritz defeated the legend for the first time, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the following match, whom he has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And had he someway survived that, it would have been title holder the Italian, versus him Fritz had dropped 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the previous seven grand slams (and Alcaraz went on to defeat a fatigued Serbian in the next round). Fritz stated in press following his defeat that he actually preferred his draw, because it offered the chance to beat the top three competitors in the sport in succession. He is well justified to aim for the accomplishment; an competitor is supposed to believe in themselves. But entering that Serbian quarter-final who else in their right mind had the lack of US winners in mind?

The American star's second serve the sole barrier between her and consistent victories

The American, twenty-eight, is ranked fourth in the world entering the upcoming ATP World Tour Finals and has won his previous six matches over No 3 the German with increasing ease. It's likely he might take that spot for himself in the future. But evidently that right now, that is as far as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard sit a chasm of performance metrics away. Fritz’s top-class delivery and powerful strength on both front side and reverse side are more than adequate to defeat most rivals on the professional circuit. When facing the handful of generational talents, however, Fritz is frequently helpless. The past few seasons has witnessed the curious rise of tall, gangly players who can nevertheless move around with the surprising speed and fluidity of much shorter men. Fritz is six-foot-five and looks it. His footwork is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his limbs. So he seldom steal a point that the other player was dictating, and hitting a soft shot versus him is usually a reliable tactic. That serves as a quite severe restriction on his potential.

The American has achieved a several dramatic, improbable advancements throughout his career. Early on of the decade, he was hovering around the bottom of the world's best thirty. Two years later, he was sniffing the top 10. Last year, he suddenly surged to No 4 – and maintained the spot. But the subsequent step, competing against and defeating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, the Italian, and including a aging Djokovic, is the highest of all. What was the commentator thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the continuing slump of American men winning grand slams when he had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just excessive and the respect for the difficulty of the challenge too little.

The American star made a personal best run to the Wimbledon semi-finals in July.

The American's performance in that exact quarter-final ought to have been enough of an indication. Djokovic won in four sets, a win that only felt uncertain for brief periods towards the very end, when Fritz had survived a few match points and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo looked well-balanced during the rallies, with the American earning plenty of opportunities to break. But Djokovic saved service break opportunity after break point, extending the streak to the brink of agony. When Fritz eventually did claim a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he promptly played a terrible service game to lose his own serve once more; the Serbian had drawn him into a skirmish peripheral to the main contest and forced him to use excessive effort to win it. Facing set points in the final game, his first serve floated to heaven. He prolonged the match two times on his backup delivery, but ultimately double-faulted. It wasn’t a collapse, I didn’t think, just a result of having to hit too many second serves.

The match was quite compelling evidence that the American is not good enough to defeat any form of the Serbian, that lost to the Spaniard in the next round and never especially seem like he believed he could win. This is absolutely fine – the Serbian is the best player ever, and may not be at the height of his physical powers anymore, but has acquired enough experience and strategic intelligence to make up for quite a bit of the decline. The issue is those who were anticipating Fritz to prevail, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was yet to accomplished anything that indicated he could.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the circuit regardless. He’s a calm, thoughtful voice in press conferences, exceeding virtually everyone on the ATP except for Daniil Medvedev, willing to not only express his emotions or the strategy he felt decided a contest, but clarify it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the blame for the United States failing to spawn a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist seems unfair. (Since the fellow American is competing alongside him in the rankings, maybe they can divide that burden.)

ATP Finals: Player Divisions

American legend Group

• The Spanish phenom
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Bjorn Borg Division

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I would likely dwell on it indefinitely if I fail to accomplish it,” the American informed a journalist in June of claiming a grand slam. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not a failure if he does not fulfill that goal, that overcoming the Spanish and Italian's young, terrifying reign is actually extremely improbable for all other players. {